Bicycle.LLCSchedule a call

← Dashboard collection

Choose dashboard — Compensation Cycle

people analytics dashboard

Compensation Cycle

Review-cycle planning, market position, distribution, spend, and equity measures.

10 pages · Power BI

These dashboards use synthetic workforce data. Values illustrate the report design.

Choose page — 3 Performance

Selected page

3 Performance

A rendered screenshot preview for this page is still pending. Showing Metrics meanwhile. Also available: Segmentation, DAX, Data model.

Metrics used on this page

  • Adj Spend

    CompPlanning · Additional Adjustment · $#,0

    USD additional-adjustment dollars; 0 when the Addl Adjustments toggle is Exclude.

  • Differentiation Ratio (High vs Meets)

    PlanBudget · Differentiation · 0.00"×"

    Merit Avg Increase (High Performers) ÷ Merit Avg Increase (Meets). Below the DifferentiationMin parameter (default 1.5×) the merit budget is barely rewarding performance.

  • Differentiation Text

    PlanBudget · Report Views · General

    Inputs to the differentiation ratio, at two decimals.

  • Differentiation Verdict

    PlanBudget · Differentiation · General

    Banded reading of the ratio (never a fake precision %): Weak / Adequate / Strong against the DifferentiationMin and DifferentiationStrong parameters; blank when there is no ratio.

  • Employees (Range Band)

    PlanBudget · Report Views · #,0

    Employees whose PRE-cycle compa-ratio is in the selected range band (promoted excluded).

  • Headcount

    CompPlanning · Headcount & Rating · #,0

    Employees in the filtered group (everyone in the cycle, whether or not they received an increase).

  • Heat Cell Color

    PlanBudget · Report Views · General

    Background shade for a rating × position-in-range cell: darker slate for higher average merit; neutral when suppressed or no merit.

  • Merit Avg Increase

    CompPlanning · Merit · 0.0%

    Merit Spend ÷ Merit Base — a true weighted average increase for recipients.

  • Merit Avg Increase (High Performers)

    PlanBudget · Differentiation · 0.0%

    Merit Avg Increase for employees rated 4–5.

  • Merit Avg Increase (Meets)

    PlanBudget · Differentiation · 0.0%

    Merit Avg Increase for employees rated 3.

  • Merit Avg Increase (Range Band)

    PlanBudget · Report Views · 0.0%

    Merit Avg Increase for employees whose PRE-cycle compa-ratio is in the selected range band.

  • Merit Base

    CompPlanning · Merit · $#,0

    Merit-eligible earnings (USD) of employees who received a merit increase.

  • Merit Grid Cell

    PlanBudget · Report Views · General

    Text for one cell of the rating × position-in-range grid: merit % and people, 'no merit increases', or 'fewer than 5 people' (suppression).

  • Merit Spend

    CompPlanning · Merit · $#,0

    Sum of USD merit increase amounts.

  • Promo Spend

    CompPlanning · Promotion · $#,0

    Sum of USD promotion increase amounts.

  • Share of All Employees

    PlanBudget · Report Views · 0.0%

    Headcount ÷ headcount of everyone in scope, ignoring the rating split (all denominators include unrated).

  • Share of All Spend

    PlanBudget · Report Views · 0.0%

    Total spend ÷ total spend of everyone in scope, ignoring the rating split.

  • Total Spend (All Types)

    CompPlanning · Total · $#,0

    Merit + Promotion + Adjustment spend (adjustment is 0 when excluded).